Ad budget that works.
Performance campaigns on Google and Meta with a clear ROAS target.
Every ad euro has to pay for itself. As a performance marketing agency we run Google Ads and Meta Ads toward one goal: return on ad spend. With clean tracking, honest reporting and campaigns that get better every week.
Performance marketing is paid online advertising judged by measurable outcomes such as clicks, inquiries or revenue: primarily through Google Ads and Meta Ads. Its central steering metric is return on ad spend (ROAS): the revenue generated per euro of ad budget.
Our approach.
Tracking first
Without clean data, optimization is guesswork. Server-side tracking and conversion APIs feed the algorithm, and you, the truth.
Structure the algorithm understands
Clearly segmented campaigns, consolidated budgets, clean signals: the foundation Google and Meta can learn on.
Systematic creative testing
Hooks, formats and messages are tested head-to-head, winners scale, losers get cut. Every week.
Scaling with discipline
Budget flows to where ROAS provably holds. No more, no less, documented in a live dashboard.
Google Ads and Meta Ads working together
In detail.
Google Ads and Meta Ads working together
Google Ads and Meta Ads solve different problems. Google captures existing demand: someone is actively searching for your service, and your ad stands in their path. That makes search campaigns the strongest channel for service providers and for anything people actively look for. Meta creates demand: your audience scrolls through Instagram or Facebook, and a strong creative sparks a need that wasn't articulated before: ideal for visual products and brands still building awareness. Practice shows the combination usually wins. Meta makes your brand known, Google collects the demand it created; whoever evaluates both accounts separately systematically undervalues Meta, because the last click often lands on Google. As a performance marketing agency we therefore steer across channels, with one shared ROAS target instead of two competing silos.
Server-side tracking: the data foundation
Browser-based tracking has been losing sight for years: ad blockers, browser restrictions and declined consent mean a relevant share of conversions never reaches the ad account. The consequence is doubly expensive. You judge campaigns on incomplete numbers, and Google's and Meta's algorithms learn from the same gappy data. Server-side tracking moves measurement to your own server: conversion data flows to the ad platforms in a more controlled and complete way, secured GDPR-compliantly via Consent Mode. That is why every engagement with us starts with the tracking setup, Google Tag Manager server-side, conversion APIs, clean event definitions, before a single euro of media budget flows. It is the least glamorous part of Google Ads management and at the same time the one with the biggest leverage: every optimization decision afterwards stands on solid numbers instead of estimates.
Landing pages decide your ROAS
The best campaign loses on a weak landing page. Buying clicks for several euros each and dumping visitors on a generic homepage means paying for traffic that cannot convert. A good landing page picks up the ad's promise, same message, same offer, same language, and leads to the action without detours: inquiry, call, purchase. Concretely that means one page per offer instead of one page for everything, load times under 2 seconds including mobile, trust elements in the right places, and a form that asks only what is necessary. We build landing pages as part of ads management because campaign and page are one system: the ad makes the promise, the page keeps it. Both get tested: ad variants against each other, page variants in A/B tests. That way ROAS rises at both ends.
The most common mistakes in ad accounts
We regularly take over existing accounts, and see the same patterns. Mistake one: a fragmented campaign structure. Dozens of campaigns with mini-budgets prevent the algorithm from collecting enough signals per campaign. Mistake two: missing or broken conversion tracking: optimization then targets clicks instead of inquiries, and the most expensive traffic wins. Mistake three: broad targeting without negative lists on Google; budget flows into search queries that will never buy. Mistake four: creatives running unchanged for months while performance quietly erodes. Mistake five: scaling by doubling budget overnight, which resets the learning phase. And the structural mistake behind them all: nobody looks into the account weekly. An ad account is not a savings book. It needs continuous care: excluding search terms, rotating creatives, moving budget to where ROAS provably holds.
The first 90 days of working together
Weeks one and two: foundation. Tracking setup or audit, account and campaign structure, audiences, first creatives and landing pages, plus a clearly defined ROAS target we let ourselves be measured against. Weeks three to six: testing phase. Campaigns ramp up, audiences and ads are tested head-to-head. Numbers fluctuate in this phase. That is normal, the algorithms are learning. We communicate that honestly instead of selling early outliers as success. Weeks seven to twelve: consolidation and scaling. Winning ads receive more budget, losers get cut, the campaign structure is tightened. From here on, the weekly rhythm applies: review, adjust, document. You see cost, revenue and ROAS at any time in the live dashboard, not in a monthly PDF. After 90 days you know reliably what a lead or sale costs through ads and whether scaling pays.
Sound familiar?
Budget burns without results
Wasted reach, wrong audiences, weak creatives. We rebuild campaigns, data-driven instead of gut feeling.
Tracking blind spots
Without clean conversion tracking, optimization is guesswork. We set up server-side tracking that actually measures.
Agency invoices, stagnant numbers
With us you see cost, revenue and ROAS in one dashboard. No PDF graveyards.
What you
get.
- →Campaign setup for Google & Meta Ads
- →Server-side conversion tracking
- →Ad creative: copy, image, video
- →Conversion-focused landing pages
- →Weekly optimization & A/B tests
- →Live dashboard with ROAS reporting
Setup
Tracking, campaign structure, creatives. The foundation in weeks 1–2.
Testing
Audiences and ads tested head-to-head, winners scaled.
Scaling
Budget flows where ROAS proves out. Adjusted weekly.
A fit if …
Companies whose ad budget burns without clear results
Shops and service providers without reliable conversion tracking
Teams switching from agency PDF reports to real numbers
Common
questions.
For solid results we recommend at least €2,000 media budget per month. Below that, the learning phase takes too long to optimize properly.
Setup from €3,000, ongoing management from €1,200 per month or a percentage of media budget, whichever is fairer for your size.
Google captures existing demand, Meta creates new demand. B2B services usually start with Google, visual product brands often with Meta. The combination frequently wins.
First data flows from day one; reliable conclusions take 4–6 weeks: the algorithms go through a learning phase, and audience and ad tests need volume. Anyone who overturns everything after two weeks restarts the learning phase again and again.
It depends on your margin. A ROAS of 4, four euros of revenue per ad euro, is solid for many shops but can mean a loss on thin margins. So we first calculate your break-even ROAS and steer campaigns toward profit, not toward pretty metrics.
Yes, if the math works: for local services with good order values, ads can turn profitable quickly. Below roughly €2,000 monthly media budget, however, the learning phase drags. Then local SEO is often the better first step. We run that calculation honestly in the intro call.
Ready for more results?
30 minutes, free. We tell you exactly where your website loses inquiries.
Book intro call